Skip to content

chore: fix formatting for gke-hub files#15587

Merged
parthea merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-gke-hub-formatting
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

chore: fix formatting for gke-hub files#15587
parthea merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-gke-hub-formatting

Conversation

@ohmayr
Copy link
Contributor

@ohmayr ohmayr commented Feb 19, 2026

fix formatting for gke-hub files

@ohmayr ohmayr requested review from a team as code owners February 19, 2026 23:12
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

gemini-code-assist bot commented Feb 19, 2026

Summary of Changes

Hello @ohmayr, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving code consistency and readability across several GKE Hub Python files. The changes primarily involve reordering and grouping import statements, as well as making minor whitespace adjustments to align with established formatting guidelines. The overall impact is a cleaner and more maintainable codebase without altering any functional logic.

Highlights

  • Import Statement Reordering: Reordered import statements in configmanagement.py and __init__.py to follow a consistent style, placing standard library imports before third-party imports.
  • Import Grouping: Consolidated multiple from ... import statements into a single, parenthesized import group in feature.py and __init__.py for improved readability.
  • Whitespace Adjustments: Added blank lines before enum definitions in configmanagement.py and removed an unnecessary blank line in rbacrolebindingactuation.py to adhere to formatting standards.
Changelog
  • packages/google-cloud-gke-hub/google/cloud/gkehub_v1/configmanagement_v1/types/configmanagement.py
    • Reordered import statements.
    • Added blank lines before enum definitions for better readability.
  • packages/google-cloud-gke-hub/google/cloud/gkehub_v1/rbacrolebindingactuation_v1/init.py
    • Reordered import statements.
    • Consolidated multiple from .types.rbacrolebindingactuation import statements into a single line.
    • Adjusted indentation and reordered internal import statements within a conditional block.
  • packages/google-cloud-gke-hub/google/cloud/gkehub_v1/rbacrolebindingactuation_v1/types/rbacrolebindingactuation.py
    • Removed an extraneous blank line after an import statement.
  • packages/google-cloud-gke-hub/google/cloud/gkehub_v1/types/feature.py
    • Grouped related from google.cloud.gkehub_v1 import statements into a single parenthesized import block.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

gemini-code-assist[bot]
gemini-code-assist bot reviewed Feb 19, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request primarily focuses on formatting fixes across several Python files related to gke-hub. The changes include reordering imports to align with common Python style conventions (e.g., standard library, then third-party, then local imports), combining multiple import statements into single parenthesized ones for better readability, and adjusting blank lines around enum definitions. These changes contribute positively to the code's maintainability and readability. No critical, high, or medium severity issues were identified in the changes.

@parthea parthea merged commit edd2b7a into main Feb 19, 2026
27 checks passed
@parthea parthea deleted the fix-gke-hub-formatting branch February 19, 2026 23:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@parthea parthea parthea approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist[bot] gemini-code-assist[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ohmayr @parthea

Comments